[openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:23:45 +0100 CET
"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm all for it, though we should probably rather wait till R2. Better
> not add too much potential for problems with the release that is
> basically intended to clone BeOS R5.
Yes, I think you are right, we should add as less as possible (to the
user API).
> > No, not DriveSetup, *DiskProbe* - the hex editor that come with
> > BeOS.
> > The Device API is widely used in the applications shipped by Be.
> You're sure, that it does? At least mine doesn't seem to (`strings
> Device' produces nothing suspicious). Besides the three ones
> mentioned
> earlier, Installer, CDBurner, bootman, clockconfig (for whatever
> reason) and writembr show signs of usage of the API.
Well, I thought it would, but apparently, I was wrong :-)
You are right again, it doesn't use the private Device API, I just
checked :)
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: Ingo Weinhold