[openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:41:13 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We might also just move it into os/support/, shouldn't we?
> If we intend to declare it a public API, we should do that. Then we
> should
> make sure, that the usual binary compatibility precautions are taken
> (for _PointerList_).
Perhaps we should have a closer look at the class interface anyway - Be
itself introduced a whole new set of such classes with Dano (but not
BObjectList), perhaps we might prefer to go a similar way, too.
>[...]
> > Of course, someone should then work on a DiskProbe replacement
> > sooner
> > or later :-))
> DriveSetup? Well, at least an almost empty implementation already
> exists
> in the tree. BTW, since DriveSetup uses the DriveSetup add-ons
> directly
> (not through the Device API), and we are not going to replicate this
> interface, this has to be done anyway.
No, not DriveSetup, *DiskProbe* - the hex editor that come with BeOS.
The Device API is widely used in the applications shipped by Be.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- » [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- [openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList
- From: Ingo Weinhold