[openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:36:30 +0100 CET
Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > have I missed any case where fPreferredTarget is not absolutely
> > superfluous? BMessenger::fHandlerToken is already
> > B_PREFERRED_TOKEN in
> > that case, anyway.
> Yes, I found that in the Message4 implementation, too. I removed it
> there already. I think there's no problem with removing it.
I already did so locally.
BTW is there any reason you removed endian handling from the
unflattening code?
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Michael Lotz
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Michael Lotz