[openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Joey Hewitt <joey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:19:36 -0700
Mathew Schofield wrote:
The simple truth is, that Haiku is unoptimized and slow ATM. Even on real
hardware. :-)
Actually i beg to differ. On my AMD64 3000+ with 1GB of Ram, Haiku
runs surprisingly well (Considiering it's state). Also in VMware haiku
runs quite well. I'm not sure why Qemu is so relatively slow, but i do
know that Qemu itself is proven to be much slower then the commercial
VMware or VirtualPC.
I hope that by maintaining compatibility with BeOS, we can also maintain
its great performance on "slow" hardware. I run a 500 MHz Celeron with
96 or so MB RAM. :P I don't run it often, but BeOS is usually snappier
than Windows 98 on this (which unfortunately I can't say for Linux.)
Although I realize everyone else has evolved out of the Stone Age of
computing that I'm still in, I think we should still make the effort to
keep Haiku snappy, small, and fast, at least by R1. :)
And we all know that Haiku will one day rule supreme, no matter the
hardware (Virtual or not) ^_^.
Yeah!
Thanks,
Joey Hewitt
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Adi Oanca
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Mathew Schofield
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Mathew Schofield
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
The simple truth is, that Haiku is unoptimized and slow ATM. Even on real hardware. :-)
Actually i beg to differ. On my AMD64 3000+ with 1GB of Ram, Haiku runs surprisingly well (Considiering it's state). Also in VMware haiku runs quite well. I'm not sure why Qemu is so relatively slow, but i do know that Qemu itself is proven to be much slower then the commercial VMware or VirtualPC.
And we all know that Haiku will one day rule supreme, no matter the hardware (Virtual or not) ^_^.
Yeah!
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Adi Oanca
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Mathew Schofield
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Mathew Schofield