[openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Haiku <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:33:04 +0100 (MET)
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Axel [iso-8859-15] Dörfler wrote:
have I missed any case where fPreferredTarget is not absolutely
superfluous?
No.
BMessenger::fHandlerToken is already B_PREFERRED_TOKEN in
that case, anyway.
Yep.
Would anyone mind if I eliminate it?
I wouldn't, at least.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeos] BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- » [openbeos] Re: BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
have I missed any case where fPreferredTarget is not absolutely superfluous?
No.
BMessenger::fHandlerToken is already B_PREFERRED_TOKEN in that case, anyway.
Yep.
I wouldn't, at least.
- [openbeos] BMessenger::fPreferredTarget
- From: Axel Dörfler