[openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:11:14 +0200 CEST
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Right, everything that uses C++ in the kernel should use util/
> > kernel_cpp.h. BTW do we have to introduce the "B" prefix in the
> > kernel
> > space?
> I'd say, some namespace isn't that bad an idea.
Definitely, but does it have to be the "B" as in "userspace API"? :-)
I actually like Waldemar's 'K' more :)
> On 2003-09-23 at 14:54:34 [+0200], Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> On 2003-09-23 at 16:19:06 [+0200], Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> PS: Wow, I love Beam, the feature for replying to multiple mails just
> rocks.
Looks like you really like it :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- » [openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- » [openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- [openbeos] Re: BLocker in disk_device_manager (and more...)
- From: Ingo Weinhold