[openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- From: LewisB <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:51:55 -0600
>
>
>> The BeOS 'as a whole' has been pretty idle, and developers
>> still active won't mind making the necessary changes to
>> cater for the broken compatibility - there aren't many of
>> them to begin with.
>
>Bzzt. Wrong.
>Do you remember how many apps broke from the transition of R4 to R5,
>because both the file system and the operating system (Media Kit, and
>others) were moving targets?
<snip>
. ` * , . * , .
>David Sowsy . /|\ BeOS Rebel and Coder . * .
>http://dsowsy.nanorevolution.com . * . * . .
I have to agree here. I STILL use 4.5.2 for my main OS. NAT (PPP) doesnt'
work in 5.0.X. Note to Network Team...I would really like NAT (PPP). please
please please
LewisB
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] BeShare
- From: Carmiac
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- From: David Sowsy
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- » [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- [openbeos] BeShare
- From: Carmiac
- [openbeos] Re: BFS and encryption.
- From: David Sowsy