[openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 15:40:58 +0200 CEST
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:22:03 +0200 François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Selon Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:24:55 +0200 François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Selon Mahmoud Al Gammal <obos@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > > that's what should happen, but if the app server cleared the
> > > > background then
> > > >
> > > > bevel would be cleared as well, unless it clips against the
> > > > update
> > > > rect &
> > > > there's something wrong with calculating the rect to be
> > > > updated...
> > > >
> > > No, because it only clears the bg of the newly exposed area, the
> > > part
> > > that wasn't "visible" before.
> > > The bevel was on the "visible" part before, so it's not cleared.
> > >
> > >
> [snip: nice ASCII ART]
> >
> > The B_FULL_UPDATE_ON_RESIZE is to be used to avoid that.
> >
> Except that may cause flickering.
SetViewColor(B_TRANSPARENT_32_BIT);
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: François Revol
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: François Revol