[openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:22:03 +0200
Selon Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:24:55 +0200 François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Selon Mahmoud Al Gammal <obos@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > that's what should happen, but if the app server cleared the
> > > background then
> > >
> > > bevel would be cleared as well, unless it clips against the update
> > > rect &
> > > there's something wrong with calculating the rect to be updated...
> > >
> > No, because it only clears the bg of the newly exposed area, the part
> > that wasn't "visible" before.
> > The bevel was on the "visible" part before, so it's not cleared.
> >
> >
[snip: nice ASCII ART]
>
> The B_FULL_UPDATE_ON_RESIZE is to be used to avoid that.
>
Except that may cause flickering.
But it's the easiest solution.
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- » [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: BBox bug
- From: Ingo Weinhold