> Marcus Overhagen <marcusoverhagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The FS shouldn't have to care about this. But the haiku vfs should be made > > smart enough to cache access time changes, and not flush them to disk unless > > there is another type of write access. > > I'm not sure I understand you: do you mean it should write out older > changes first, and wait a bit until recent changes are written? I meant it shouldn't flush, as long as there are only access-time changes that need to be written. however, implementing that would be crude I think. regards Marcus Viel oder wenig? Schnell oder langsam? Unbegrenzt surfen + telefonieren ohne Zeit- und Volumenbegrenzung? DAS TOP ANGEBOT JETZT bei Arcor: günstig und schnell mit DSL - das All-Inclusive-Paket für clevere Doppel-Sparer, nur 44,85 ? inkl. DSL- und ISDN-Grundgebühr! http://www.arcor.de/rd/emf-dsl-2