[openbeos] Re: Apache 2.0 update
- From: "David Reid" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:18:48 +0100
Given that I'm the one who does the beos work on apache - why not just ask
me?
I mean that would be the easy thing to do wouldn't it?
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nik Derewianka" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:14 AM
Subject: [openbeos] Apache 2.0 update
> First - thanks to Peter moore.
>
> The DBEOS flag helped it compile, just FYI, you still have to explicitly
> state a prefix as the default will not work with just the DBEOS flags.
>
> Secondly - its still broken ;) Browsers can connect, they dont timeout,
> and as soon as the server is stopped, the page is rendered into the
> browser windows - looks like something isnt being sent at the end to let
> them know that the page download is complete. This was with R5
> netserver, installing BONE just completely hosed my BeOS setup. None of
> this is surprising or worrying.
>
> Quick question: Should we still ask project developers if they can make
> their code work with BeOS R5 or should we hold off till there is
> something more OBOS specific. I know that binary and source
> compatibility is aimed for, but this article
> http://open-beos.sourceforge.net/nsl.php?15 shows that a different
> network stack is in place from BeOS R5. If i do bug-hunt and try and
> get devs to fix things like apache for R5, will they then have to turn
> around and reimplement parts of it once OBOS appears ?? (ie am i
> wasting their time ?)
>
> Regards,
> Nik
>
>
>
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Name suggestion
- From: Elver Loho
- [openbeos] Apache 2.0 update
- From: Nik Derewianka
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Apache 2.0 update
- » [openbeos] Re: Apache 2.0 update
- » [openbeos] Re: Apache 2.0 update
- [openbeos] Re: Name suggestion
- From: Elver Loho
- [openbeos] Apache 2.0 update
- From: Nik Derewianka