[openbeos] AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: "Marius Soutier" <spybreak@xxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:04:35 +0200
>The C++ syntax is clearly a lot nicer than the one of Objective-C. And
>there is not much to say against using C++ no matter what he tries to
>tell us :-)
Think so, too. I've read that Apple implemented Objective-C++ in X 10.1,
so I guess many developers aren't too happy with Obj-C.
>C++ is just not as powerful as Java or Objective-C when it comes to
>OOD. Things like the FBC problem is a real show stopper;
What is FBC?
>So, if you meet someone who comes from the OOD department, he won't
>like C++, not at all. That's just a habit, it doesn't really stand
>against reality :-)
Ok :)
The only question I ask myself is if C++ is dying. I mean in
universities it's being replaced by Java. And now that MS has ist own
language...
-Marius
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: François Revol
- [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: Frank D. Engel, Jr.
- [openbeos] Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: Charlie Clark
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- » [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- » [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- » [openbeos] AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: François Revol
- [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: Frank D. Engel, Jr.
- [openbeos] Re: Innovation: Design and Programming
- From: Charlie Clark