[haiku-web] Re: Color of the ticket-shed

Waldemar Kornewald <wkornew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Anyway, I'd like to hear some arguments for/against using
> > > Enhancement
> >> vs. Task for the other ticket type.
> > What about "bug" and "feature request"? Although I'd also be
> > satisfied
> > with "enhancement" (but I don't like "defect").
> I think that you're misunderstanding what we want. There are three
> potential
> ticket types:
> * bug
> * feature request
> * task (or enhancement or ...)
>
> The question is: how do we call the last one? Mikael wants to call it
> "enhancement", but we do not always "enhance" and "fix" something.
> There are
> other types of tasks like "improve design/usability" which do neither
> fit
> "bug/defect" nor "enhancement". That's why IMHO "task" should be
> chosen.

There is only a fine line between enhancing design and improving
design, isn't it? I mean am fiine with "enhancement", and I don't
really see the point in debating over this that long already.

> About the "feature request" ticket type I'm not sure. Maybe we should
> start
> without it and see if it's really needed? I mean, if someone files a
> feature
> request it will either be marked invalid or it becomes a real task,
> so maybe
> feature requests don't need their own ticket type.

Depends on the resolutions, but I generally agree with you here.

Bye,
   Axel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List

Other related posts: