On 2009-11-27 at 18:16:52 [+0100], Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > It is not a shell service for developers though, so it should not > > contain things like an automated build system or something like that. > > Although, that could maybe be a good candidate for another virtual machine ;) It could be, yes. And we should really make up our mind about what else to do with baron, *after* we have watched it with all the services running for a couple of days. The thing with more VMs is: we have no more IPs available! Web-only services can be hidden behind baron's apache in reverse proxy mode (double-dispatching the incoming requests to the internal VM using a private IP). I suppose a build service could work like that. cheers, Oliver