[haiku-gsoc] Re: unit-tests vs. test apps (was: Re: [HCD08] ICMPfunctional test)
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-gsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:17:40 +0200 CEST
<philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I would be very much in favour of separating both again. Either
> > have
> > another top-level folder "unit-tests", or have different folders
> > for
> > them under "tests/" - I find the current mix a bit confusing.
> I agree that all unit tests relying on the same test framework
> (CppUnit) should be
> under a common root, and not the current mix. But they are still
> tests, and I'm for all
> tests - unit, bench, individual apps, whatever - be located under src
> /tests/.
I can agree with that :-)
> On the ICMP topic, does this mean Yin should try to write his tests
> using our
> CppUnit design?
> Would make sense to favorized reusing the same design as much and
> each time
> it's possible.
> As it is here.
I dunno - as much as I would like everyone to use the unit tests, I'm
not even sure if they currently run on Haiku and/or compile there. I've
just been too lazy in the past to look into this either, as writing a
small test app was usually much faster...
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [haiku-gsoc] Re: unit-tests vs. test apps (was: Re: [HCD08] ICMPfunctional test)
- From: philippe.houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-gsoc] Re: unit-tests vs. test apps (was: Re: [HCD08] ICMPfunctional test)
- » [haiku-gsoc] Re: unit-tests vs. test apps (was: Re: [HCD08] ICMPfunctional test)
- [haiku-gsoc] Re: unit-tests vs. test apps (was: Re: [HCD08] ICMPfunctional test)
- From: philippe.houdoin