[haiku-development] Re: subversion default config directories on Haiku
- From: Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:01:04 +0200
On 2009-09-03 at 11:10:08 [+0200], scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Stephan Assmus<superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 2009-09-03 at 03:59:23 [+0200], Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ingo Weinhold<ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Attached is a patch against subversion 1.2.1 from the days when I
> >> > built subversion for BeOS. No idea whether the current versions of
> >> > the affected files still have any resemblence to the ones patched
> >> > (or if they still exist at all), but maybe the patch is of any help.
> >>
> >> I may be wrong, but it looks like you forgot the actual attachment :)
> >
> > Somehow it's inconvenient, isn't it? I'd rather get the occasional 2 MB
> > image attached than not having attachements work at all. I almost never
> > use the archives myself, so that may be the reason why I don't care so
> > much about the argument, that the attachements would be lost in the
> > archives anyway. :-)
>
> Well I still look forward to see that patch, just to compare it with what
> I've already done. I posted a new image and a patch to add it with
> ticket 4363, note that the 2 new files need to be moved over first for
> the patch to work. Turns out it wasn't subversion that required expat,
> but apr-util that detected it and then required it. So I just added expat
> as a dependency for apr-util. That or i can go back and rebuild apr-util
> to not use expat.
> Still need someone to add Git and Mercurial to the alpha images. Those
> files are already on haiku-files.org
Will try to take care of that ASAP.
> I might try building Perl in the next day or two, we'll see how it goes.
AFAIK, Ingo has built Perl 5.10.1, but some tests were broken and he tried
to track down the issues in Perl and/or Haiku. But if 5.10.0 works fine
(and there have not been regressions in Haiku that caused some tests of
5.10.1 to fail, which would make them fail for 5.10.0 as well) then we
could go with that I suppose.
Best regards,
-Stephan
Other related posts:
