"Niels Reedijk" <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/3/29, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>: > > PS: I wonder whether we need some patch tracking system. Patches > > to the > > mailing list can easily get lost, if no one feels directly > > responsible. > Perhaps we could create a special ticket type in Trac. At the other > hand: since all patches are automatically bug fixes or enhancements, > they could just fall under either one of those. Perhaps we should use > the keywords (they are currently disabled) where people can indicate > the ticket contains a patch, or we could just require the summary > field to start with [patch] or something like that. I think Trac as is is fine, already. It would be nice to be able mark a ticket that it contains a patch, but that shouldn't be done via the summary; tickets are usually created without a patch, and might later get a patch attached by someone for review. Bye, Axel.