On 2011-03-30 at 12:59:10 [+0200], Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 30/03/2011 10:46, Ankur Sethi a écrit : > > BTW, I thought Haiku as an organization was not too keen on having GPL > > code in the default builds? What makes btrfs okay as a possible future > > filesystem? > In the default builds it's ok, but an MIT-Licenced Haiku should still be > self-contained (and bootable). There is no MIT license only Haiku. If we removed all non-MIT software, it wouldn't boot anymore. Even removing just the GPL software (bash, GNU utils,...) would do the trick. > Having support for a GPL filesystem is fine, requiring to boot from it > is not. *shrug* CU, Ingo