[haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:03:29 +0200 CEST
"scott mc" <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm getting ready to work on the Haiku alpha packages for yasm, and
> others. I've been putting everything into /boot/common, but tried
> out
> the new DiskUsage program and it looks like by default
> /boot/home/config is full of stuff, but /boot/common is nearly empty.
> Question is, which way should we go for Alpha1?
/boot/common is supposed to get all the stuff in the future, and that
may or may not include alpha 1, depending on Ingo's motivation and time
:-)
In any case, it's the first choice for system-wide installations.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- From: Donn Cave
- References:
- [haiku-development] /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- From: scott mc
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- » [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- » [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- » [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- » [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- » [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- [haiku-development] Re: /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- From: Donn Cave
- [haiku-development] /boot/home/config vs. /boot/common
- From: scott mc