Disclaimer: I'm not actually advocating that terminal should change all of the shortcuts. That was just for the sake of argument. I'm sure too many people would whine about the copy/paste thing. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you don't have a Mac-like keyboard with an explicit command key > this will always devolve into having to special case the Terminal > application. I personally don't think the inconsistency is worth it > (Alt-C and Alt-V everywhere for cut and paste, EXCEPT Terminal where > all of sudden you need to add a shift.) I would argue that terminal should have the ability to be exempt from the normal rules because it is a special case. It provides a completely unique way of interfacing with the system that is totally different from the gui. > If anything we should try to design a Haiku-friendly Bash key binding > setup. Or the Terminal could pass through to the shell the shortcuts > it isn't actually using. In fact how much overlap is there between the > Bash key bindings and the shortcuts in our Terminal? That might be a > decent solution and it should be doable (though it might require > app_server changes.) Allowing pass-through of unused keys is probably the favorable solution but you're always going to run into the long time bash user with a customized setup who finds that his/her keys aren't available. But, you can't please everybody :) --Chris