On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Stefano Ceccherini > <stefano.ceccherini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2009/6/1 Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> are pretty core, Mesa and vim maybe not so much) > > > > Mesa is pretty much mandatory, since we have a BGLView in our public API. > > I think it depends on how complex our port of it is. If we could > simple add their repo as a mandatory dependency in this proposed > system I don't think it would be a problem. > I'd be against setting any other project's repo as a dependency. A stable pre-built image is one thing, but to rely on another project's repo is just asking for our build to get broken. -scottmc