[haiku-development] Re: VOTE: Git or Mercurial (hg) as Haiku's new source control tool
- From: Alex von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:20:58 -0500
On Fri, 13 May 2011 18:33:42 -0400
Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I finally found the time to implement a way of fetching
> > somewhat useful revisions from git repos.
> > They look like this (for a clean state, i.e. a revision from
> > Haiku's repo): haiku/master-39382-g1234567
> > or like this (for a revision not available in Haiku's repo):
> > haiku/master-39387-g7654321 [haiku/master-39382-g1234567]
> > or even like this (for a revision with changes in the working dir):
> > haiku/master-39387-g7654321-dirty
> > [haiku/master-39382-g1234567]
>
> So the second number is just a count of the commits, more or less?
> That might even match up with the SVN revisions in a git svn clone of
> our SVN repo.
>
> Those look really good to me. Can we just decide on Git and be done
> with it?
>
> Or maybe all the current fence-sitters can just cast their vote for
> Git, and hopefully bring it into first place :)
>
Here are the latest numbers as of this email:
GIT: 7; HG: 9
I have a live spreadsheet of who voted for what here:
http://goo.gl/93ytv
+1 to what Ryan said :)
-- Alex
Other related posts:
