2013/1/13 Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 01/13/2013 10:38 PM, François Revol wrote: >>> Is this mostly correct? Should we use another entry in haiku_loader >>> for EFI based systems? >> >> I don't see why you need yet another stage just for that. > > Indeed. It also cannot work this way without a BIOS emulation, unless you > actually let haiku_loader have an EFI backend. With a standard EFI entry > point; there is no need to load the haiku_loader from a BFS disk. Do you mean having a haiku_loader built with the efi api and ABI? That will make things more complicated. Or am I misunderstanding you? Please elaborate if possible. If we need to do that perhaps do enough in the efi application and just pass the info needed to haiku_loader? (I rather try to keep work at a minimum for the first version.) /Fredrik Holmqvist, TQH