On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So if we indeed send out more mails directly, we should really get a more sane > (but more vulnerable) mail system setup, which either accepts the bounces and > delivers them somewhere, or at least actively closes the SMTP port to minimize > the waiting time for foreign SMTP servers. > > Well, now that I've written that down, I guess it's probably a good idea to > improve our SMTP setup no matter what :-) Yep :) We're gonna have to move it eventually anyway (since it's hosted with Webfaction currently). - Urias