[haiku-development] Re: Trac down, bug report here: efi_gpt.cpp has functions with wrong number of parameters

  • From: "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:52:56 +0200

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:20:35 +0200
> Von: Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 2009-07-24 at 18:16:00 [+0200], Urias McCullough
> <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Ingo Weinhold<ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > If I may throw in a suggestion: Maybe it's a better idea to rethink
> the
> > > hosting situation entirely and consider consolidating the servers for
> the
> > > different Haiku related internet services (including svn). That would
> mean
> > > coughing up a bit more money for a dedicated server.
> > 
> > Yes, that suggestion has come up before - specifically I have heard a
> > couple recommendations that we purchase VPS hosting (our own virtual
> > server) which we can upgrade memory/cpu/disk/bandwidth on as needed.
> > 
> > This would allow us to install whatever we want, and scale it as
> necessary.
> > 
> > I have not personally reviewed the pricing on such solutions, but I'd
> > like to investigate this avenue further.
> > 
> > A dedicated physical server would also be an option, although I would
> > feel better if a dedicated provider was maintaining the redundancy for
> > us.
> 
> Just to put a tag on it: we could easily get a physical server with an
> i7-920 
> quad-core (with HT on top), 8 GB memory, 2x750 GB disks and 2 TB of
> traffic 
> for 49 EUR per month.

Sounds good. Given the mere hardware cost one got to wonder how this can work 
for the provider. Not complaining, though... :-)

> That kind of iron should be capable of running enough virtual machines to
> keep 
> the different services separate.

Definitely a good idea. If we decide to move the repository, too, I wouldn't 
like to see it on the same virtual machine as those potentially amok running 
web services (which are probably also more susceptible to attacks). :-) Which 
IMO also speaks against a (single) VPS.

CU, Ingo

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. haiku-development
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2009