[haiku-development] Re: Towards Haiku Alpha 2 or Beta 1

  • From: Ralf Schülke <ralf.schuelke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:56:34 +0100

I think alpha 2 is real, audio problems and boot problems are to big
in time. For a beta must all function implemented, them must and can
make better this for a r1 !

2009/11/8, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear developers,
>
> It has been a nice warm fuzzy feeling, but the time has come to stop
> congratulating ourselves with the release of alpha 1. Let's get to
> work! ;-)
>
> At BeGeistert there was some discussion on feature requirements for
> Haiku R1, but as far as I know there was no discussion on where to go
> next (and in my opinion, as long as something has not been discussed
> on the mailing list it does not exist).
>
> There are roughly two options: a time based release and a feature
> based release. In the first case we will agree on a schedule and let
> time decide what goes in the next release. In that way, the next
> release will most likely be alpha 2. In the case of a feature based
> release, we will work on a feature list and release when those are
> satisfactory implemented. In this case the code determines when to
> release. This could potentially be beta 1 (if all the features for R1
> are implemented).
>
> Note that the feature-based release does not mean that there should
> not be any form of scheduling. I think that if alpha 1 has shown us
> anything, is that there is use for a deadline in order to help
> developers prioritize their work.
>
> Anyway, I just want to start some discussion on the possibilities for
> the future. So please enter your opinions.
>
> Also, this is not a vote. +1 or -1 by itself are not meaningful
> contributions to a discussion.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> N>
>
>

-- 
Von meinen Mobilgerät aus gesendet

Other related posts: