I think alpha 2 is real, audio problems and boot problems are to big in time. For a beta must all function implemented, them must and can make better this for a r1 ! 2009/11/8, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>: > Dear developers, > > It has been a nice warm fuzzy feeling, but the time has come to stop > congratulating ourselves with the release of alpha 1. Let's get to > work! ;-) > > At BeGeistert there was some discussion on feature requirements for > Haiku R1, but as far as I know there was no discussion on where to go > next (and in my opinion, as long as something has not been discussed > on the mailing list it does not exist). > > There are roughly two options: a time based release and a feature > based release. In the first case we will agree on a schedule and let > time decide what goes in the next release. In that way, the next > release will most likely be alpha 2. In the case of a feature based > release, we will work on a feature list and release when those are > satisfactory implemented. In this case the code determines when to > release. This could potentially be beta 1 (if all the features for R1 > are implemented). > > Note that the feature-based release does not mean that there should > not be any form of scheduling. I think that if alpha 1 has shown us > anything, is that there is use for a deadline in order to help > developers prioritize their work. > > Anyway, I just want to start some discussion on the possibilities for > the future. So please enter your opinions. > > Also, this is not a vote. +1 or -1 by itself are not meaningful > contributions to a discussion. > > Kind regards, > > N> > > -- Von meinen Mobilgerät aus gesendet