On 21/04/2012 16:59, Ingo Weinhold wrote: > To be honest this does puzzle me. I mean the termcap definitions should be > the same everywhere -- exactly because of remote logins, since otherwise it > doesn't even make sense to use a common terminal type like "xterm" instead > of just one specific for the particular terminal app (and version) for the > local OS. Ah, I thought I was getting stupid :D > > But then again, the whole termcap/terminfo is legacy and I wonder why no > one has managed to introduce a method that works the other way around (i.e. > let the client application ask the terminal for its configuration). - Because no body remain large enough to be followed on this (OpenGroup?), - because noone cares, it just works well enough, - because you didn't yet submit a draft to POSIX or an RFC ? :D François.