[haiku-development] Re: Stack & Tile update
- From: Hong Yul Yang <hongyul.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:58:00 +1300
Ah, I see. If it's a trivial fix then that would be much appreciated.
Otherwise you can let me know. Thanks! Hong Yul
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Joseph Prostko
<joe.prostko+haiku@xxxxxxxxx<joe.prostko%2Bhaiku@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Joseph Prostko
> <joe.prostko+haiku@xxxxxxxxx <joe.prostko%2Bhaiku@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Hong Yul Yang <hongyul.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> No problem :) Here's an unpdated patch (against r33627) post merging and
> >> regression bugs fixing.
> >>
> >>
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~hongyul/research/patches/stack-and-tile.diff<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/%7Ehongyul/research/patches/stack-and-tile.diff>
> >>
> >
> > I initially tried applying this to r33738, but it didn't apply
> > cleanly. After doing an "svn up -r33627", applying the patch, and
> > then doing an "svn up", all went well though. I haven't gotten to
> > test it yet though, as my current build hasn't completed yet.
> >
>
> Just as a follow-up, apparently I never did anything but a dry-run
> application of the patch before. The last revision it applies 100%
> cleanly to (without fuzz) is r33696. Upon doing an "svn up", the only
> conflict is in DefaultDecorator.h. I'd take a look at it, but I'm
> heading to sleep in a couple of minutes. It's probably just a simple
> matter to fix though, since that header isn't very big.
>
> - joe
>
>
--
Hong Yul
Other related posts: