I've decided to take the plunge and merge the latest Haiku trunk into our Stack and Tile branch. Hopefully it'll be done by the end of the day :) cheers, Hong Yul On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Joseph Prostko < joe.prostko+haiku@xxxxxxxxx <joe.prostko%2Bhaiku@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Joseph Prostko > <joe.prostko+haiku@xxxxxxxxx <joe.prostko%2Bhaiku@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Joseph Prostko > >> <joe.prostko+haiku@xxxxxxxxx <joe.prostko%2Bhaiku@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > >>> Yeah, the stack-and-tile.diff doesn't apply cleanly to r33609, > unfortunately. > >> > >> Might it be easier to apply it to a historical revision and svn up to > >> the latest? > >> > >> You can for example revert your tree to an older one with svn up -R > 32151 > >> > > > > Yeah, that had crossed my mind, but then I decided to dabble on some > > GCC work instead. I'll try what you suggested later tonight after I > > get home, and if things apply cleanly and Stack and Tile seems to > > work, I'll attach a patch to a newer SVN revision to this ticket. If > > I get conflicts and there is obvious work involved, I'll most likely > > not mess with it any further. > > > > First off, not sure why I referred to this email thread as a ticket. :) > > As an update though, the last revision the patch applies cleanly to is > 32242. I applied the patch to that, and then did an "svn up", which > resulted in conflicts in Window.h, Desktop.h, ServerWindow.cpp, > Window.cpp, and Desktop.cpp (in src/servers/app). > > I may get around to looking into the issues later this weekend, but > thought I'd mention where the situation lies in case somebody wants to > take a crack at it before me or Ryan or Hong. > > - joe > > -- Hong Yul