Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2009-11-27 at 16:18:46 [+0100], Mikhail Panasyuk <otoko@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > [...] > Anyway, it certainly wouldn't harm, if someone had a closer look at > the uses > of the thread::priority field to verify whether there really is a > point to > having a next_priority field. IIRC it had been introduced to implement priority boost on a semaphore release - a concept that didn't work out well, and has been removed completely in the mean time AFAICT. So I guess we can probably remove it, but someone should have a closer look indeed ;-) Bye, Axel.