[haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:00:34 +0200 CEST
> On Tuesday 04 September 2007 04.02.48 Ryan Leavengood wrote:
> > I have already talked about how WebKit has constant commits to
> > their
> > tree and if the admins decide to put it into our tree, then they
> > will
> > also need to assign some people to keep it updated, as I don't want
> > that job for the rest of time. But let me get the port finished
> > first
> > before we decide all that ;)
>
> Another option is to set the property svn:externals on the folder
> containing
> the moving target. That way, we're forced to have an up-to date port.
> One
> problem though is that the build can break beyond our control.
> It would be nice to use this approach for things like eg. WebKit and
> libavcodec which constantly gets improved.
But also constantly break their own API.
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- From: Stefano Ceccherini
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- From: Fredrik Ekdahl
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- » [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- From: Stefano Ceccherini
- [haiku-development] Re: SAMBA port [was (no subject)]
- From: Fredrik Ekdahl