[haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible?
- From: Alex Wilson <yourpalal2@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:10:50 -0700
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello there, > > R1a3 is no longer a suitable development platform. > The current code cannot be compiled out of the box. > IMO, that alone is reason to do a release. Yes, once again we are at the point that the first suggestion to fix many problems is to download a nightly, so I think you're right in calling for a new release. > IIRC, IMAP needs to be fixed, as the current code could lead to > server-side data loss. > Axel has some work on it -- https://github.com/axeld/haiku/tree/imap > Though, it's not yet ready to be merged. Another issue that is, imo, a release blocker is #8001 which means that many people who had good graphics support in A3 will experience a serious regression. Although Clemens has committed a workaround, it's still not perfect. > One suggestion was to simply remove the IMAP add-on (via > build/jam/HaikuImage), preventing casual users from > experiencing the data loss. I don't think it would be good to remove IMAP altogether, could we just revert the IMAP work in the release branch to a point when it was more stable? I haven't been following the IMAP stuff, so I don't know what the original motivation for working on the code was. > Would March 18th be too soon for a release? I assume the goal would be to get it released before GSoC begins? March 18th seems pretty fast to me, especially if we factor in at least a week for image testing. --Alex
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible?
- From: Clemens
- [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible?
- References:
- [haiku-development] R1a4 -- possible?
- From: Matt Madia
- [haiku-development] R1a4 -- possible?
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] R1a4 -- possible? - Matt Madia
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Alex Wilson
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - David Given
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - SMC.Collins
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Clemens
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - "Axel Dörfler"
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - scottmc
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Humdinger
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Matt Madia
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Donn Cave
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Oliver Tappe
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Humdinger
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - fanoIlprimo
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Sean Healy
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Andrew Hudson
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - fano il primo
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - SMC.Collins
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Andrew Hudson
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - David Given
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - fano il primo
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - fano il primo
- » [haiku-development] Re: R1a4 -- possible? - Adrien Destugues