[haiku-development] QT for R2
- From: Andrew Wood <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:30:40 +0000
Im very sad to hear this is seriously being contemplated.The whole point of Haiku was to re-create the Be OS and hand in hand with that is the Be API which I still think is far more elegant than QT or anything else.
What is the beneft of QT on Haiku as opposed to QT on Linux or FreeBSD? As far as I can see, nothing. So why bother?
Am I alone in thinking this is a big mistake?
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2
- From: Joseph Groover
- [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2
- From: Rimas Kudelis
- [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] QT for R2 - Andrew Wood
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Joseph Groover
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Andrew Wood
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Stephan Aßmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Isak Andersson
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Clemens Zeidler
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Ralf Schülke
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Clemens Zeidler
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Rimas Kudelis
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - pulkomandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - pulkomandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - John Scipione
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Przemysław Pintal
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Przemysław Pintal
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - John Scipione
- » [haiku-development] Re: QT for R2 - Ingo Weinhold