> > Probably a good idea, though maybe it'd be prudent to hold off > > until > > that one data corruption bug is fixed? > > Why that? I figure it's probably more useful for others than the > nightly images we publish right now. > It should ease following (and debating) the long path to our first > release. Often I got complains from ppl I pointed to images who didn't find a browser or other apps... so having the opt packages in is definitely better when pointing ppl to an image to discover it. > > Where is NetSurf ? :D > > We haven't really decided to put it in yet, have we? > Unless it provides some real advantage (and looks polished), I would > actually be hesitant to add just another browser just because of > short > boot times. > OTOH BeHappy could very well be such an advantage, if we put the > BeBook > on disk, too. Need to fix the crash on exit when it doesn't find it, but it should work right away. Didn't try indexing our own version though. François.