> On Feb 20, 2015, at 3:59 PM, pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:29:42AM +0100, Axel Dörfler wrote: >> Am 19/02/2015 um 21:29 schrieb Adrien Destugues: >>> And what I'd prefer in that case (I'm fine with either this or the >>> current one): >>> /boot/system (not packages) >>> /boot/system/packaged (packages) >>> ~/config/packaged (packages) >>> ~/config/ (not packages) >> >> Same here. It's consistent, and does not add more cruft to the user folder. >> > > Damn -- I seem to be thinking opposite to everyone else again. (:-/) [… snip ...] > So, my preference: > > /boot/system (packaged, as now) > /boot/system/non-packaged (as now) > ~/config (non-packaged -- free for user) > ~/packaged (my preference) or ~/config/packaged > ~/config/packages -> ...packaged/packages This seems a bit convoluted to me. my preference: /boot/system (non-packaged) /boot/system/packages (packaged) /boot/home/config (non-packaged) /boot/home/config/packages (packaged) that way /boot/system exactly matches /boot/home/config. packages go in read-only packages directories, otherwise the layout resembles on pre-PM Haiku.