scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once it's gotten a bit more testing I was hoping to add this as an > optionalpackage. Would there be any objections to that? Yes, but only a bit. A package like this is pretty much unmaintainable IMO - it should be broken down to the single packages, and then a meta package should be created that depends on them all. However, some packages (like dl, openssl) point to broken ports (both are available in a Haiku installation, anyway, the former is even part of libroot. so). Besides that, I think we're abusing the optional package mechanism, anyway, so it probably doesn't matter anymore what stuff we add there. It's just a sign that we really should get our real packagement solution implemented. Bye, Axel.