On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Christian Packmann<Christian.Packmann@xxxxxx> wrote: > Er, don't overdo it! ;-) And it won't be too interesting with the current > version of the benchmark anyway, I'd rather have you do extensive tests with > the next release. I already have done several improvements to the various > routines, so the benchmark is already obsolete. The next version will also > include some unrolled routines, which might behave very differently on > various architectures. Sounds like a plan. You get me an updated version, I'll feed you benchmarks from my pile of hardware :D BTW, we also have some Pentium M lappies at work I can test the USB stick version on... - Urias