On 5/24/07, Michael Phipps <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1) This amount of debate and controversy is *exactly* why I was/am/will be in favor of keeping R1 as close to R5 as possible. I think that these conversations are good and valuable, don't get me wrong, but I think that there is always the potential to distract from completing R1. :-/
I suppose I should have known better, but frankly I had no idea what this would blow up into. It sure seemed like a simple idea. But certainly not as important as our few other deviations from R5, like the layout library. But I really think this shows how important it will be to get organized after R1 is out. There is a huge chance for things to really go awry once the simple "make it like R5" mantra is no longer applicable. Even though it seems like the Glass Elevator stuff has played out, this goes to show how even simple things can become complicated.
2) Having said that, what Chris said blends in nicely to the "design" (ideas, really) that I was talking about earlier: BNotification wraps BMessage and BMessanger to make a "Kit" (really this should go in the Interface Kit, at some point). Send() sends the message to some predefined mime type. By default, there is a Snarl-esque little popup view thing. Maybe an icon in the deskbar and allows you to turn them on or off or go to preferences.
What is funny after all this discussion and "controversy" what Chris and you just described is exactly what I originally envisioned when I started this thread. Though I agree the conversation was still useful. Now moving to the GE list, Ryan