[haiku-development] Re: Need some input for design decisions for continuous integration script

Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> a ticket for this is at : http://dev.osdrawer.net/issues/show/264
> 
> Listed below are the architecture & jam target combinations that are
> currently supported in the program. Which of these would be best to
> report compile errors for?

Well, the idea should be that all architectures will cause reports - 
otherwise errors in that direction might not be noticed.

> Are there any jam targets that should be added?

I don't think so.

> I've concerns about sending an individual email for each
> arch+jamtarget combination.

And rightly so, I think -- too much information is likely to get 
ignored :-)

> I'm also trying to figure out a way to determine if the build error
> from revision k is the same as k-1 --- eg, an offending commit,
> followed by one or more non-related commits.

I would only send a report for the first error that appeared, but make 
newer ones available from the link in that report.
Only if there was a good revision in between I would send new reports 
again. A good revision would not be one where everything builds again, 
but the configuration that triggered the error builds again.
Does that sound like a viable solution?

Bye,
   Axel.

Other related posts: