On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Donn Cave <donn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, I can only speak from experience - building from Haiku has worked > fine for me. Like I say, if you already have other uses for a Linux > partition, that's a different matter, but I personally wouldn't go there > just for shorter builds (I didn't know that - since the compiler would be > the same, would the extra time be mostly BFS filesystem?) A lot of things go into it, most of it is kernel performance at various tasks like context switching, process creation/teardown, memory allocation, filesystem / cache / I/O scheduling...all areas where Haiku is comparatively young and not yet very performance tuned, hence the speed difference. BFS can slow it down somewhat as well, since file creation / deletion by necessity also involves updating whatever indices those files belong to, which doesn't occur on other OSes. That's not enough to account for anything close to a 5 fold performance difference on its own though. Regards, Rene