On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 15:23 +0100, Matthieu Guéguen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Petter Holt Juliussen > <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Simon Taylor skrev: > > > > > I don't like the idea of the app-icon (I don't see a good reason why > > > this menu should be different from the others). In the same way as the > > > file menu is called "File" regardless of the name of your file, > > > "Application" makes perfect sense to me, and seems the obvious home > > > for About... Options... and Quit. > > This is probably the most logical way to do it. This would also make it > > more consistent, not using the application-name itself. > > 'Application' would have application-specific options, 'File' the > > file-specific and so on. Don't know how it would look/work > > in practice. > > > > > > +1 > > Also note that on MacOSX, it is really interesting to have the > application name in the menubar because there is only one menubar on > top. So the app name allows to easily know to which app the menu > belong to. > On Haiku, you don't need app name in the menu. So I'd prefer to have a > menu called "Application". Yeah makes sense. I wouldn't object an app icon, but an "Application" menu would certainly do the job too. +1 Regards, Denis