On 07/04/2008, Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Pier Luigi Fiorini > > <pierluigi.fiorini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Nice! My main arguments agains libpurple are D-Bus and GPL, glib may be a > > price we can pay to gain more/better protocol support. > > For me the only disadvantage is the GPL license which *may* not be a > problem > > for a protocol add-on. > > > The problem is the IM kit addons still have to link against libim.so > if I remember correctly, which would be a violation if distributed > with the IM Kit in such a form. Unless said plugin was distributed > completely separately from the IM Kit itself and/or required hand > compilation. I'm personally not for using libpurple because of the license mainly, but other reason too. > > > Rene > > -- Salvatore Benedetto (a.k.a. emitrax) Student of Computer Engineer University of Pisa www.messinalug.org