[haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- From: Gerald Zajac <zajacg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:05:31 -0400
Urias McCullough wrote:
Below is the VESA mode info from the syslog of my computer which has the Intel 810 chip:On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Axel Dörfler<axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Fredrik Holmqvist <fredrik.holmqvist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Let me rephrase my earlier message. I think it allowed an earlier version of VESA before but there were too many misbehaving cards which lead to a lot of garbled monitors. If that was the case, and what stopped i810 working, maybe cards known to work but isn't 2.0 could be allowed as exceptions.AFAIK we restricted the loader to VBE2 from the beginning on. I just can't remember the specific reasons for this anymore - flat buffer would be a good one, though :-)Well, I do know for a fact that this laptop seen running here in "safe mode": http://www.flickr.com/photos/umccullough/378472590/in/set-72157615324866653/ no longer displays properly. I tried it a couple months ago and "safe mode" is scrambled now (looks like a video memory alignment issue). I believe it's an ancient mid-90's Cirrus Logic chip running on a 640x480 resolution LCD. I also hooked it to an external display which did no better. I didn't really make a big deal out of it because clearly it's ... old. But it does mean *something* has changed in the VESA support over the years :) If you want, I can provide a serial log from that device...but it might not be soon. I'll also pull out my i810-based machines and see what I can find.
VESA version = 3.0 OEM string: Intel(R) 8xx Chipset Video BIOS 109: 132 x 25 x 4 (a = 207, mem = 0, phy = 0, p = 4, b = 1) 10a: 132 x 43 x 4 (a = 207, mem = 0, phy = 0, p = 4, b = 1) 10b: 132 x 50 x 4 (a = 207, mem = 0, phy = 0, p = 4, b = 1) 10c: 132 x 60 x 4 (a = 207, mem = 0, phy = 0, p = 4, b = 1) 11d: 320 x 200 x 8 (a = 27, mem = 4, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 10e: 320 x 200 x 16 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 100: 640 x 400 x 8 (a = 27, mem = 4, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 127: 640 x 400 x 16 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 128: 640 x 400 x 24 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 101: 640 x 480 x 8 (a = 27, mem = 4, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 110: 640 x 480 x 15 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 111: 640 x 480 x 16 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 112: 640 x 480 x 24 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 102: 800 x 600 x 4 (a = 27, mem = 3, phy = 0, p = 4, b = 1) 103: 800 x 600 x 8 (a = 27, mem = 4, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 113: 800 x 600 x 15 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 114: 800 x 600 x 16 (a = 27, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 115: 800 x 600 x 24 (a = 26, mem = 6, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) 105: 1024 x 768 x 8 (a = 27, mem = 4, phy = 0, p = 1, b = 1) No VESA compatible graphics! -- Gerald
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- From: Fredrik Holmqvist
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
- From: Urias McCullough
- [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed?
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Stephan Assmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Jorge G. Mare
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Jorge G. Mare
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Bruno Albuquerque
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Bruno Albuquerque
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Michael Crawford
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Fredrik Holmqvist
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - pete . goodeve
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Fredrik Holmqvist
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Fredrik Holmqvist
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Axel Dörfler
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - beos
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Fredrik Modèen
- » [haiku-development] Re: Is Intel 810 Video Driver Needed? - Gerald Zajac