On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:16:10AM -0400, Rene Gollent wrote: > Unless all the enhancements are tightly focused on the same small > area, it's actually much easier/better from a ticket management > standpoint to split them up for a number of reasons, most notably that > it's easier to take ownership of one small chunk, fix it, and close > the ticket so it's clear that it's done. If you have a ticket with a > giant laundry list of unrelated enhancements in it, the only way to > manage it is to keep a checklist in there, which often will mean > anyone wishing to make those changes will have to read through the > whole ticket history to figure out what has/hasn't been done. This > also it makes ownership less clear, since it becomes less obvious if > the current owner of the ticket is actively working on a particular > feature or not, and thus makes it more annoying to coordinate not > stepping on each other's toes. OK. Makes sense. I'll retract my suggestion then... (:-/) Might be nice to have that 'laundry list' somewhere, though, to get an overview of the app's state -- the wiki, perhaps? -- Pete --