Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Right, the FAQ on FSF is mostly an opinion piece based on the FSF > > interpretation of the license. I would consider this a somewhat > > "biased" view, TBH. > Er, the FSF wrote the darn license, though. So their interpretation > is as > close as you can get to the actual intention of the legal text. Almost - the computing world changed a lot since the GPL v2 was written. So yes, their intentions probably haven't changed a lot over the years, but that doesn't mean the GPL v2 is still adequate to express them. It leaves a lot open for interpretation, which does make it a poor license IMO. Bye, Axel.