On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> It does. >> >> At least SOCK_STREAM sockets are supported, but those are the ones that are >> mostly used. > > Is there any practical reason to use SOCK_DGRAM for a domain socket? > These are useful for example for commands sent from one application to another in Unix, and other things were a packet of data makes more sense than a stream of data. By the way, SOCK_DGRAM seems to be more "similar" to BMessages than SOCK_STREAM. Best regards, Paulo Matias