[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.w.pfeiffer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:59:44 +0200
Am 16.09.2008 um 07:52 schrieb Keven Tipping:
As I've said before, I'm by no means a "real" programmer. The end
result works and is stable, so I can't see anything wrong with
that... But if someone else (who knows what they are doing) wants to
check out why makeinfo was segfaulting (so you don't have to clear
out the *.texi files to prevent that), then I'm guessing it
shouldn't be a problem to have the *fixed* changes committed to SVN
and the relative build documents updated?
+1 :)
- Michael
- References:
- [haiku-development] GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Keven Tipping
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Michael Pfeiffer
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Keven Tipping
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- [haiku-development] GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Keven Tipping
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Michael Pfeiffer
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2.95.x on Mac OS X Intel (10.5.x)
- From: Keven Tipping