[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: "Ari Haviv" <arielbhaviv@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:29:58 -0400
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:38 PM, André Braga <meianoite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 14:36, <meianoite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Anyway, please *consider* LLVM. It might suit us much better than GCC.
>
> And of course I mean this in the context of Haiku R2.
Don't forget the clang frontend (http://clang.llvm.org/). And the fact
that llvm/clang is BSD is also important in case a company like Intel
would like to make special optimizations. Intel involvement may sound
far fetched but they were a major investor of Be Inc. We should still
be able to make a case for Haiku to them as the future is multi
multi-core and pervasive multithreading is more relevant than ever.
btw how is that scheduler coming along?
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: André Braga
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Ryan Leavengood
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: meianoite
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: André Braga
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: André Braga
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Ryan Leavengood
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: meianoite
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: André Braga