[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:08:05 +0200
On 2008-08-27 at 03:44:19 [+0200], Mat Hounsell <mat_geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> Doesn't have varargs for macros (which I need).
I'm curious, do you mean something else than this kind of construct:
#define TRACE(x...) dprintf(x)
? Because that is already supported in gcc 2.95.3.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell