[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Maurice Kalinowski <haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:20:16 +0200
Hey,
this debate seems to be starting again and again, with no results at all.
David McPaul wrote:
The debate was about whether we should compile Haiku with GCC4 instead of GCC2.
For the DR1, definitely not. There are only a few people using GCC4
systems and those hardly work full time on these systems. Unfortunately
we have some behavior differences between the two versions (consider
firewire, cortex/tracker crashes, etc.). Talking about myself only, I
have Haiku currently up for maximum 10 minutes to debug on my freshly
generated images, I have no clue about stability or such on a daily
basis, GCC4 that is.
As the core developers (meaning Axel, Ingo, Stephan, etc.) seem to use
GCC2 still, it does not make sense to force them to switch now. I guess
they weren't even willing too. If I am wrong, please tell me, I'd be
delighted if one of you use GCC4.
Including GCC 4 libraries and compiler in addition to GCC2 libraries
and compiler on DR1 is a seperate issue.
AFAIK it's not even possible to build the gcc2 libraries yourself and
embed them into the image, currently it downloads the optional package
Ingo provides. So there seems to be a lot of work missing until we get
this all set up, uhm meaning until Ingo sets this up :P
Don't get me wrong, I am one of the persons crying for GCC4 as much as
possible. But from a release point of view, I'd more like to see the
first release out, than needing to add 2-3 more months for this feature.
Maurice
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: David McPaul
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
The debate was about whether we should compile Haiku with GCC4 instead of GCC2.
Including GCC 4 libraries and compiler in addition to GCC2 libraries and compiler on DR1 is a seperate issue.
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: David McPaul